Publication Date
2021
Document Type
Article
Abstract
The topic of microaggressions is hot currently. Diversity administrators regularly propagate lists of alleged microaggressions and express confidence that listed items reflect what some psychologists claim they do: racism that is, at the very least, unconscious in the mind of the speaker. Legal academics are increasingly leveraging microaggression research in theorizing law and proposing legal change. But how scientifically legitimate are claims by some psychologists about what acts constitute microaggressions? The authors—one a law professor, the other a psychologist—argue that the answer is “not much.” In this article, the authors dissect the studies, and critique the claims, of microaggression researchers. They then explore the ideological glue that seems to hold the current microaggression construct together, and that best explains its propagative success. They close by warning of the socially caustic and legally pernicious effects the current microaggression construct can cause if academics, administrators, and the broader culture continue to subscribe to it without healthy skepticism.
Publication Title
Texas Review of Law & Politics
Recommended Citation
Edward Cantu & Lee Jussim,
Microaggressions, Questionable Science, and Free Speech,
Texas Review of Law & Politics
(2021).
Available at:
https://irlaw.umkc.edu/faculty_works/125
Included in
First Amendment Commons, Law and Psychology Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Education Commons, Legal Profession Commons