Publication Date
2000
Document Type
Article
Abstract
To date, the application of therapeutic jurisprudence principles has been concentrated mainly on specialized trial courts: drug treatment courts, domestic violence courts, criminal courts, and juvenile and family courts. Its application to trial courts generally, as well as its application to the appellate courts, remains largely unexplored. This Article considers three areas in which trial and appellate courts may want to consider applying therapeutic jurisprudence.
My conclusions about the application of therapeutic jurisprudence to the appellate courts are admittedly tentative ones: my day job is sitting as a state general jurisdiction trial judge, not as an appellate court judge. Although I have had the opportunity to sit by designation on my state's appellate courts, the writing of appellate opinions is not my daily fare. From my vantage point, however, both trial and appellate courts can, in many instances, do similar types of things to achieve a more therapeutic outcome.
Publication Title
Seattle University Law Review
Volume
24
Issue
2
Recommended Citation
Steve Leben,
Thoughts on Some Potential Appellate and Trial Court Applications of Therapeutic Jurisprudence,
24
Seattle University Law Review
467
(2000).
Available at:
https://irlaw.umkc.edu/faculty_works/268
Included in
Judges Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons