Publication Date
2016
Document Type
Article
Abstract
In spite of the compelling logic that would support extending copyright to engineered DNA sequences, copyright protection for genetic code has not been legally recognized in the US, or as far as we know anywhere. The Copyright Act is silent on the point, the courts do not appear to have ever addressed the question, and the Copyright Office has taken the position that an engineered genetic sequence is not copyrightable subject matter. In an attempt to advance the conversation, we submitted an engineered DNA sequence to the Copyright Office for registration, and then appealed the Office’s decision refusing to register engineered genetic sequences. This article reports the outcome of our experiment, and provides as supplementary material the actual letter we submitted to the Copyright Office appealing its initial decision not to register genetic sequences (the “Appeal”), along with the Copyright Office’s letter denying our appeal (the “Denial), which provides a detailed explanation of the Office’s position regarding the copyrightability of engineered DNA. The bulk of the article is devoted to refuting the legal and policy justifications set forth by the Office in its Denial.
Publication Title
Biotechnology Law Report
Volume
35
Issue
3
Recommended Citation
Christopher M. Holman, Claes Gustafsson & Andrew W. Torrance,
Are Engineered Genetic Sequences Copyrightable?: The U.S. Copyright Office Addresses a Matter of First Impression,
35
Biotechnology Law Report
103
(2016).
Available at:
https://irlaw.umkc.edu/faculty_works/395
Included in
Intellectual Property Law Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons